PparKing required a Laravel expert capable of maintaining and extending their existing application under a monthly retainer-based contract, to ensure continuous development, bug fixes, and new feature development.
The legacy system suffered from significant performance bottlenecks. Its architecture relied on direct file system operations for image processing which was an inherently inefficient approach that created substantial processing delays.
As the retainer contract progressed, we identified critical limitations within Laravel Nova - the admin panel framework initially employed. These constraints prompted a migration to FilamentPHP, our preferred Admin Panel Builder. Consequently, we rebuilt the application using the existing database infrastructure, which delivered 3 key improvements:
Enhanced operational flexibility
Measurably faster processing speeds
The capability to develop more tailored views, screens, and interfaces to ease operations
This architectural shift from Laravel Nova to FilamentPHP ultimately enabled direct client portal access and expanded self-service functionality for end users.
Important!
Our Codebase Assessment Process
When engaging with existing codebases, we adhere to a rigorous evaluation protocol. Initially, we require full access to the project source code and are prepared to execute non-disclosure agreements to ensure confidentiality.
However, if preliminary access is unavailable, we stipulate contractual provisions permitting immediate project termination, as certain codebases prove unmaintainable due to substandard code quality or inherent security vulnerabilities that pose operational risks.
Our assessment evaluates whether the codebase architecture supports continued development and whether successful knowledge transfer is achievable.
This involves reconstructing the original developer's design rationale, determining code intelligibility, assessing architectural coherence, and verifying that the existing structure can accommodate the required feature extensions and modifications.
Our engagement model prioritizes client autonomy. We deliberately avoid creating vendor lock-in through proprietary dependencies or opaque implementations. The two-year retainer arrangement delivered continuous feature development whilst maintaining transparent, extensible code that PparKing could independently maintain or transition to alternative providers.